« March 2008 | Main | May 2008 »

April 2008

April 24, 2008

Strategic Change for the LCMS

Chris Rosebrough from Extreme Theology has a chilling post that all confessional Lutherans need to read and heed. Rosebrough has an MBA from Pepperdine University and the emphasis of his graduate work was Change Management.

In his latest post called Changing the LCMS, Rosebrough claims that President Kieschnick is following the Change Management Process developed by Harvard Business Review's John Kotter.  Rosebrough then shows us where he thinks the LCMS is in the process.

The most chilling aspect to Rosebrough's analysis is that he claims that the VERY NEXT STEP in the process will involve President Kieschnick proposing sweeping structural changes that would grant unprecedented powers to the president. According to Rosebrough, if Kieschnick's structural changes are implemented then there will be no way to 'save the LCMS'.

Click Here to read Rosebrough's analysis.

Kieschnick Letter - A Failed Presidency

The long overdue public response from Pres. Kieschnick to the Issues, Etc. scandal is a testimony to the utter failure of his administration.  The synodical president fails to take leadership responsibility for the decisions made under his watch, fails to acknowledge the outrage expressed in 7200 signatures on the petition, fails to acknowledge the personal harm caused to Pr. Wilken and Mr. Schwarz, and fails to recognize that this action has contributed to the divisiveness he so decries within the synod.  At least, the letter acknowledges that his failed fiscal policies have not only caused the cancellation of Issues, Etc. but are causing the recall of deployed missionaries from the field.

With all due respect, we offer this analysis and commentary:

A decision to discontinue “Issues, Etc.” on KFUO AM Radio was made March 18, 2008, Tuesday of Holy Week, for fiscal reasons described in statements issued after the decision became public. At the April 21, 2008, meeting of the Council of Presidents (COP) of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, financial details precipitating this decision were discussed in executive session by Mr. David Strand, Executive Director of the LCMS Board for Communication Services (BCS), with specific fiscal information provided by the Vice-President-Finance—Treasurer of the Synod, Dr. Thomas Kuchta. The decision was made solely by Mr. Strand after consultation with the chairman of the BCS, Mr. Dennis Clauss, with whom I subsequently spoke over the phone regarding this matter. KFUO Radio is a ministry under the umbrella of the Board for Communication Services.

Comment:  "A decision...was made."  The choice of the passive voice is interesting.  It makes it sound as though this decision was beyond anyone's control.  The "fiscal reasons" have been analyzed elsewhere on this site.

Comment:  "in executive session" - This ensures that the details of this discussion are never presented to the public.

Comment:  Mr. David Strand is held solely responsible for the decision.  He consulted Mr. Dennis Clauss, the chairman of the BCS, who then spoke with Pres. Kieschnick.  This means that Pres. Kieschnick was fully apprised of the decision and its timing.   The last sentence seems to indicate that Pres. Kieschnick has no authority whatsoever regarding the BCS, and could not even counsel or strongly urge a different course of action.

Prior to its implementation, Mr. Strand also informed me as president of the Synod of his decision. I regret that I did not counsel Mr. Strand to postpone implementation of the decision until sometime other than Holy Week. It is obvious that the timing and process connected with the discontinuation of the program have contributed to the disappointment expressed by listeners and supporters of “Issues, Etc.” in and beyond the Synod. Human Resources policies, compliance with applicable employment regulations, the process of implementation of reduction in force, accompanying severance and outplacement considerations, etc., do not allow the sharing of details about this matter. I am deeply saddened by the anxiety, worry, and consternation experienced in the Synod by those directly and indirectly affected by the decision.

Comment:  "I regret that I did not counsel Mr. Strand..."  This is a significant failure of leadership.  In this sentence, Pres. Kieschnick indicates that he had the power to counsel and failed to do so.  He seems completely unaware of the exact nature of the outrage and thinks it has to do only with the fact that it happened in Holy Week.  Holy Week simply amplified the outrage.  The outcry is over the cancellation of a "mission and ministry" of the LCMS for financial reasons during the peak of its fund raising efforts as millions of dollars are being spent on high-priced consultants and given to congregations whose teachings and practices fail to meet the confessional standards of the LCMS.

Comment:  "Human Resources policies, compliance...."  Does this include a blanket gag order on the severance package?  Resorting to left-hand language of law and business in a pastoral letter from the synodical president is an utter failure of pastoral example and leadership.

Comment:  "I am deep saddened by the anxiety, worry, and consternation...."  This shows a failure to listen.  If there is "anxiety," it is over the theological and financial condition of the LCMS.  If there is "worry," it is over the fact that a Lutheran confessional voice that was heard worldwide has been silenced.  If there is "consternation," it is over the intrusion of seeker-sensitive, purpose-driven methodologies into a "confessional and orthodox" synod of churches.

Some have interpreted the decision to discontinue “Issues, Etc.” as being theological or political in nature or purpose. Such interpretations have no basis in fact.

Comment:  Stone-walled denial does not constitute proof.  This essentially calls all who question this decision liars and slanderers.  The reason such speculations continue is the failure of the Kieschnick administration to be completely transparent to the churches to which it is accountable.

As president of the Synod, I respectfully request and pastorally encourage all in the Synod to be patient and charitable regarding this matter, putting the best construction on actions and decisions connected therewith. I pray for the day when the financial resources of our Synod do not necessitate the reduction in force of radio personnel, the return of missionaries from the foreign mission field, or any other such difficult and painful decisions. And I pray for peace and harmony in our beloved Synod.

Comment:  This is a misuse of the 8th commandment.  The 8th commandment forbids us to speak ill of persons.  It does not forbid constructive criticism of public actions in public office.  What use is the call for patience when the administration is simply engaged in patient stonewalling?

Comment:  "I pray for the day when the financial resources of our Synod do not necessitate...."  This is an admission of a failed fiscal policy that has driven the synod into debt, has caused it to borrow against its own funds, including designated world relief funds, has caused the cancellation of Issues, Etc. and the RETURN OF MISSIONARIES FROM THE FOREIGN MISSION FIELD! 

How many missionaries have been recalled since 2001, the year Pres. Kieschnick was elected?  How many missionaries are going to be recalled this fiscal year? 

How does a synod justify spending millions of dollars on high-priced consultants, giving large sums of money to congregations who set up "Satan billboards" (though not necessarily with those very dollars), while canceling a leading apologetic and evangelistic radio broadcast and recalling deployed missionaries from the field?

COP Letter - A Failure of Pastoral Leadership

This letter was issued by the Council of Presidents (COP) "without dissenting vote."  This means either that the dissenters abstained or they were not present.  Practically, this letter utilizes the 4th and 8th commandments as a shield to protect elected synodical officials from criticism over their public actions and as a club to stifle any further district actions expressing disapproval and dissent.  Pastorally, this letter fails to address the harm the abrupt cancellation of Issues, Etc. caused to its many listeners and to the mission and ministry of the LCMS.  This letter makes it clear that the COP is a council of bureaucrats and not a group of shepherds (bishops).

We are fully aware of pain in our Synod over the discontinuation of the KFUO Radio program “Issues, Etc.” When one member of the Body of Christ hurts—for whatever reason—we all hurt. We are very concerned about how this pain has affected the church as it carries Christ’s gifts to the world. Only the devil would rejoice over this disruption!

Comment:  Being "fully aware" of the pain of the decision, the COP proceeds to use the 4th and 8th commandments to silence any discussion.  This is to use the Law on those who are hurting and to place the responsibility on the hurting.

Comment:  "Only the devil would rejoice over this disruption." Such a statement is a theology of glory.  It denies the fact that God works His good under all things (Romans 8).  When a church body is veering from the truth of the Gospel, one would expect God to stir up trouble, as He did in OT Israel.  This also implies that those who are protesting this decision are motivated by the devil!

We encourage the whole church prayerfully to reflect and ponder on a few matters. We realize that in our understanding and application of the 4th commandment, this matter is not the responsibility of the Council of Presidents. The Synod has given the authority for oversight and implementation of KFUO and its programming decisions to the Board for Communication Services (BCS). We must regard with Christian charity and trust the judgment of our duly elected brothers and sisters in Christ on the BCS, along with its Executive Director, Mr. David Strand.

Comment:  Assuming that the 4th commandment actually applies to synodical structures, this application of the 4th commandment would make all criticism of the official actions of public officials anywhere a sin.  According to the small catechism's interpretation of the 4th commandment, we are to love, honor, serve, and obey our parents and other authorities.  This does not include trust.  "Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save." (Psalm 146:3)

Comment:  The BCS was not party to the decision to cancel Issues, Etc., but was informed after the fact.  The letter seems to indicate that this was an action of the BCS along with Mr. Strand.

We regret the timing of this decision, which was implemented during Holy Week, one of the most important times of the church year. In response to the concern that the manner in which this decision was implemented lacked Christian compassion, it is important to note our belief that such was not the case. These matters are also addressed in the statement on this topic by the President of our Synod, attached hereto, which we commend to you.

Comment:  Simple denial does not constitute the truth.  What "regret" does the COP have?  That the liturgical calendar wasn't consulted?  Would the offense have been any less had the show been canceled abruptly and without warning and the web site ordered down on Tuesday in the second week of Easter?

The COP may corporately (and without dissent) "believe" that this action lacked Christian compassion, but the facts speak to the contrary.

The manner in which the church addresses, discusses, and resolves disagreements is as important as the disagreement itself. In this regard, the 8th commandment’s focus on upholding the reputation of brothers and sisters in Christ is most important. We are all the baptized of Christ, washed in His blood, and we possess His image of blamelessness. Where there have been communications that have violated the integrity of a brother or sister in Christ, Christ calls us to repentance. Here, too, the devil would delight in divisiveness resulting from matters such as this. Let us walk with integrity, honesty, and humility, giving glory to Jesus Christ, “bearing with one another and, if one has a complaint against another, forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive” (Colossians 3:13).

Comment:  We agree that the manner of disagreement is as important as the disagreement itself.  The question remains, "How then are we to disagree?  And how can we disagree when those responsible refuse to answer legitimate questions their actions have raised?"  The 8th commandment does not forbid the respectful criticism of and disagreement with public actions by public officials.  Nor would it forbid a call for impeachment or resignation of a public official who violated the stewardship of his office.  The 8th commandment requires that these actions be done with all due respect and honor for the office and the reputation of the person.

Comment:  "Where there have been communications that have violated the integrity of a brother or sister in Christ...."  This would hopefully apply to the attempts by district presidents and others to slander the reputation of Ms. Mollie Z. Hemingway who broke this scandal to the Wall Street Journal.  Those involved would set a fine example of pastoral leadership by apologizing publicly and in writing to Ms. Hemingway.

This would hopefully also apply to Pr. Todd Wilken and Mr. Jeff Schwarz, who names and reputations have been tarnished by the scandalous way in which their show, a "mission and ministry" of the LCMS, was terminated, by the secrecy that has enshrouded this decision, and by the attempted gag order attached to their severance package.

Comment:  "...the devil would delight in divisiveness..."  This presumes to know the mind of God.  In the OT, God routinely stirs up trouble when Israel is in danger of apostasy.  The implicit charge is that those who dissent this decision are being divisive.  The true division is caused by those who would promote an emergent, seeker-sensitive, purpose-driven Gospel and muzzle all criticism.

Comment:  "...forgive one another..."  This presumes a confession of sin.  Would the district presidents, the synodical president, or Mr. Strand confess their sin, we would certainly be obligated to forgive them.  We have heard no such confession.  Having forgiven them, we must still hold them publicly accountable for their stewardship in office, and where necessary, take the appropriate and lawful action.

Jesus Christ is the Lord of the church. As this church goes forward in reaching unbelievers with the precious Gospel of our Lord, let us be “eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3).

Comment:  Certainly, one cannot disagree with this exhortation.  But one must ask:  How does cancellation of a show that was heard worldwide, that proclaimed the Gospel and engaged in Christian apologetics, not go forward "reaching unbelievers."  Exhortation is one thing; action quite another. 

Comment:  "...the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace..."  This is a unity worked by the Holy Spirit through the Word, not a corporate unity achieved by stone-walling explanations and stifling criticism.

The peace of the Lord be with you all!

And also with you.

Letter from the Council of Presidents

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ:

We, the members of the Council of Presidents of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, greet you in the Name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, who is the Savior of the whole world.

We are fully aware of pain in our Synod over the discontinuation of the KFUO Radio program “Issues, Etc.” When one member of the Body of Christ hurts—for whatever reason—we all hurt. We are very concerned about how this pain has affected the church as it carries Christ’s gifts to the world. Only the devil would rejoice over this disruption!

We encourage the whole church prayerfully to reflect and ponder on a few matters. We realize that in our understanding and application of the 4th commandment, this matter is not the responsibility of the Council of Presidents. The Synod has given the authority for oversight and implementation of KFUO and its programming decisions to the Board for Communication Services (BCS). We must regard with Christian charity and trust the judgment of our duly elected brothers and sisters in Christ on the BCS, along with its Executive Director, Mr. David Strand.

We regret the timing of this decision, which was implemented during Holy Week, one of the most important times of the church year. In response to the concern that the manner in which this decision was implemented lacked Christian compassion, it is important to note our belief that such was not the case. These matters are also addressed in the statement on this topic by the President of our Synod, attached hereto, which we commend to you.

The manner in which the church addresses, discusses, and resolves disagreements is as important as the disagreement itself. In this regard, the 8th commandment’s focus on upholding the reputation of brothers and sisters in Christ is most important. We are all the baptized of Christ, washed in His blood, and we possess His image of blamelessness. Where there have been communications that have violated the integrity of a brother or sister in Christ, Christ calls us to repentance. Here, too, the devil would delight in divisiveness resulting from matters such as this. Let us walk with integrity, honesty, and humility, giving glory to Jesus Christ, “bearing with one another and, if one has a complaint against another, forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive” (Colossians 3:13).

Jesus Christ is the Lord of the church. As this church goes forward in reaching unbelievers with the precious Gospel of our Lord, let us be “eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3).

The peace of the Lord be with you all!

Council of Presidents
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
Adopted April 22, 2008, without dissenting vote

Letter from Pres. Kieschnick

Greetings in the Name of Jesus Christ, Savior of the world and Lord of the universe, through whom alone we receive forgiveness of sin, life, and salvation!

A decision to discontinue “Issues, Etc.” on KFUO AM Radio was made March 18, 2008, Tuesday of Holy Week, for fiscal reasons described in statements issued after the decision became public. At the April 21, 2008, meeting of the Council of Presidents (COP) of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, financial details precipitating this decision were discussed in executive session by Mr. David Strand, Executive Director of the LCMS Board for Communication Services (BCS), with specific fiscal information provided by the Vice-President-Finance—Treasurer of the Synod, Dr. Thomas Kuchta. The decision was made solely by Mr. Strand after consultation with the chairman of the BCS, Mr. Dennis Clauss, with whom I subsequently spoke over the phone regarding this matter. KFUO Radio is a ministry under the umbrella of the Board for Communication Services.

Prior to its implementation, Mr. Strand also informed me as president of the Synod of his decision. I regret that I did not counsel Mr. Strand to postpone implementation of the decision until sometime other than Holy Week. It is obvious that the timing and process connected with the discontinuation of the program have contributed to the disappointment expressed by listeners and supporters of “Issues, Etc.” in and beyond the Synod. Human Resources policies, compliance with applicable employment regulations, the process of implementation of reduction in force, accompanying severance and outplacement considerations, etc., do not allow the sharing of details about this matter. I am deeply saddened by the anxiety, worry, and consternation experienced in the Synod by those directly and indirectly affected by the decision.

Some have interpreted the decision to discontinue “Issues, Etc.” as being theological or political in nature or purpose. Such interpretations have no basis in fact.

As president of the Synod, I respectfully request and pastorally encourage all in the Synod to be patient and charitable regarding this matter, putting the best construction on actions and decisions connected therewith. I pray for the day when the financial resources of our Synod do not necessitate the reduction in force of radio personnel, the return of missionaries from the foreign mission field, or any other such difficult and painful decisions. And I pray for peace and harmony in our beloved Synod.

Dr. Gerald B. Kieschnick, President
The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod

April 22, 2008

How Large Was the Issues Etc. Internet Audience?

The Quantcast website keeps traffic information for over 2 million websites.  One of the sites that they monitored traffic for was IssuesEtc.org

The Quantcast traffic stats are VERY revealing.  They show that IssuesEtc.org was receiving over 12,000 unique visitors a month.  That is FAR and AWAY a bigger figure than the 1,600 listeners that Strand claimed listened to the show.

Which leads us to ask a few very logical questions:

1. If David Strand and the LCMS canceled Issues Etc because they wanted to replace the program with one they felt had broader appeal, then why haven't they made the archives of the Afternoon Show available via podcast and the internet? 

2. If they wanted to 'grow' their audience then why have they not aggressively tried to win over podcast and internet listeners?

By refusing to post the archives for the Afternoon Show it is clear that KFUO has literally cut off the vast majority of their listening audience.

 

Strand's explanation continues to make ZERO sense.

Quant

April 21, 2008

Who/What Changed Their Minds?

M.Z. Hemingway, a former member of the BCS who has been covering the Issues, Etc. scandal, reports at Ausburg1530 that David Strand is now pointing the finger at LCMS Treasurer Thomas Kuchta.  Hemingway reports that at the recent meeting of the BCS, the first since the cancellation of Issues, Etc., Strand indicated that he was under intense pressure from the Board of Directors and Tom Kuchta to get rid of Issues, Etc.

This is indeed strange, if true.  Thomas Kuchta has been a loyal supporter of Issues, Etc.  In fact, Ms. Hemingway indicates that he thought that the sale of KFUO-FM might make more shows like Issues, Etc. possible on KFUO-AM.  Who/what changed Mr. Kuchta's mind?

As late as September 2007, David Strand was publicly singing the praises of Issues, Etc.  Who/what changed his mind?

Perhaps the answer to these questions lies with Pres. Kieschnick, who said:
"The KFUO decision transpired with my awareness but neither by my order nor at my direction."

Presidential "awareness" could entail a considerable amount of pressure as well.

Apparently the lawyers have gotten more involved, since Todd Wilken and Jeff Schwarz are refusing the gag order that is attached to their severance package.  Good for them! 

Which brings up the matter of LCMS legal counsel.  The lead attorney for the LCMS from Thompson Coburn LLD is none other than Sherri Strand, the wife of David Strand.  One thing you have to say about the LCMS - it is truly focused on the family.

HT:  BCS Meeting



April 19, 2008

More Press for Issues, Etc.

Tim Townsend, religion reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, has written another piece on the cancellation of Issues, Etc.  While the Post-Dispatch is not the Wall Street Journal, it is the major newspaper for the St. Louis area and provides good coverage of local issues in religion.  In addition to nicely summarizing the controversy to date, Townsend's article has several choice quotes worth pondering:

Strand also said the program's audience was too narrow. —"'Issues' was a strong show, but where we stand now in terms of listenership, it seems wise to try some news things to broaden our reach," he said.

Does "narrow" mean something like "hyperorthodox"?  He must be referring to the one-third of 1% who sign petitions or the 1,650 listeners in St. Louis and the 64 who listen to the live stream on the internet.

Does "broaden our reach" mean something like "being more seeker-sensitive"?

What does Mr. Strand know about KFUO's listenership?  In his initial letter, he cited 4 year old listener data and did not include the download internet audience?

Critics say the church's audience numbers don't include the large number of people who listened to the show online via podcasts. Strand said that "Issues, Etc." was downloaded more than any other KFUO-AM program, but that in order to succeed, the station needs "live listeners" and that "it's not accurate to say every download translates to a listener."

Succeed?  What is the definition of "success" for a program that is categorized as a "mission and ministry" of the synod?  If it's financial success, why not charge a nominal fee for downloads?  Why not have an interactive web site with member privileges?  Why not expand the listener base through syndication?

Time and time again his public statements, David Strand has shown that he is completely ignorant of how the internet operates.  How can this man be the executive director of communications services for the Synod when he doesn't seem to have a clue about a major component of communications in the 21st century?

Why wasn't David Strand fired along with station management instead of Todd and Jeff?

The church currently produces seven religious shows, one of which is a replacement for "Issues, Etc." The new program, called "The Afternoon Show," is different from "Issues, Etc.," said Strand, in that "it doesn't dwell largely on Lutheran apologetics at a sophisticated level. It still takes its Gospel proclamation seriously, but it finds new ways to capture attention."

So the LCMS doesn't have a place for Lutheran apologetics at a sophisticated level?  That's a sad statement on the mentality of the same synod that once published Der Lutheraner.  If you think Wilken was tough you should read Walther!

Does "The Afternoon Show" actually take Gospel proclamation seriously?  We notice that the show is not archived nor is it available for download.  This would seem to be a narrower audience.  A recent segment talked about prayer journals for soccer moms.  Now there's taking Gospel proclamation seriously.

Does "find new ways to capture attention" mean "be more seeker-sensitive on the airways"?  Clearly tough-minded apologetics has no place in the LCMS except perhaps in the back pages of some academic journal.  This attitude on the part of one in charge of synodical communications is both disturbing and shocking to say the least.

Strand said politics had nothing to do with the decision to pull "Issues, Etc." "This was a financial decision. All 2.5 million of our members would call themselves confessional Lutherans, so I'm not sure where this idea of division comes from," he said. "Like most denominations, we have differences of opinion on things … but Dr. Kieschnick wants a deeper sense of peace throughout the church."

Pure party line.  What's Strand supposed to say to a reporter?  "Cutting Issues, Etc. was pure politics"?  This paragraph simply boggles the mind.  It's pure, corporate talking points straight from the top.

"All 2.5 million of our members would call themselves confessional Lutherans."  Excuse me?  Some don't call even themselves Lutheran, at least on their signboards.  The term "confessional" is viewed as a divisive term in most parts of the synod, often linked to "abrasive," "narrow," and "hyperorthodoxy."

"I'm not sure where this idea of division comes from" - This statement either comes out of deep, pathological denial in need of therapy or a stubborn insistence that the corporate "vision" of unity is correct in spite of reality.

"Differences of opinion on things" - like worship, the efficacy of the Word and Sacraments, the nature of the Gospel, those kinds of issues, etc.

"Dr. Kieschnick wants a deeper sense of peace throughout the church" - so he cuts off the only show that speaks for confessional Lutheranism in an apologetic way.  There's peacemaking for you.  In fact, Pres. Kieschnick has presided over some of the most divisive years in the LCMS since the Seminex era.  If Kieschnick desires a deeper sense of peace, why doesn't he exercise any pastoral leadership in this controversy?  Why doesn't he offer a full, transparent answer to the multitude of questions his actions have raised?  Why does he use heavy-handed corporate tactics such as gag orders and threats by district presidents to stifle honest questions and dissent?

Strand would not say whether the church is considering a sale of its stations (it also owns classical station KFUO-FM), but he did say they were in financial trouble and that —"'Issues' was the largest and most obvious cut at our disposal."

If you think the cancellation of Issues, Etc. was controversial, wait until the Kieschnick administration tries to sell KFUO.  The St. Louis seminary is not likely to be pleased with the sale of the oldest religious station in the United States founded by Dr. Walter A. Maier that sits on its campus.  There are many long-time supporters who would be outraged if KFUO goes on the auction block.  What's next?  Walther's log cabin seminary?

If KFUO AM/FM is in such deep financial trouble, why was station management not called on the purple carpet and fired?  The BCS already had given them a vote of no-confidence.  Why was this situation allowed to continue since 2001, the year Pres. Kieschnick took office?  What kind of peacemaking leadership allows a financial situation to continue for seven years and then fires employees instead of the management responsible?

The Missouri Synod is a highly volatile church body right now," said the Rev. Frederic W. Baue, pastor of Bethany Evangelical Church in Fairview Heights.  "There is a definite split between those who favor the megachurch marketing approach to outreach ministry," said Baue, "and those who trust the word of God and the sacraments to do the job of bringing people to the faith."

Finally, a clear word of truth to close out the article.  Too bad it has to come from a lowly parish pastor and not from synodical leadership.

HT:  St. Louis Post-Dispatch / Augsburg 1530

spacer

April 17, 2008

Sharathon Time!!

05_shar_logoToday the KFUO “Sharathon 2008" begins.

Since the removal of Issues, Etc. from the air on March 18, we have learned some sad facts regarding how business was being done at KFUO.

We should use this opportunity to encourage KFUO and the LCMS to share the reasons for canceling Issues Etc. Call KFUO at (800) 730-2727 and ask them one or more of the following questions.

1. Why does KFUO earn an ”F” grade for financial transparency with Ministry Watch, an organization that rates the 400 largest church ministries in the United States? Would you give to any other Christian media ministry that earned an “F”?

2. Why were significant KFUO-FM costs shifted to KFUO-AM as late as 2007? 

3. Can you be sure that a check made out to “KFUO” will go to KFUO-AM and not to KFUO-FM? 

4. Why does it cost the LCMS Foundation 38.4 cents to raise a dollar for KFUO? Why did the LCMS Foundation charge KFUO $361,604 to raise $941,739 in 2007?

5. Why does the Program/Development Director for KFUO-FM serve on the board of directors for, and raise money for a group that supports embryonic stem cell research?

6. If KFUO management disagreed with the cancellation of Issues, Etc., why haven’t they publicly stated this disagreement?

Call (800) 730-2727 now.  Operators are standing by.

April 15, 2008

A New 95 Theses

Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, the public bulletin board of his day. In like manner, we, Athanasius and Chrysostom, post these 95 theses on the door of the internet. Like the original theses, these are debatable, for we believe that it is through vigorous debate that the spirits are tested and truth is revealed.

In publishing these theses, we do not intend to foment division, but to expose those who are creating division within the body of Christ. We are not addressing any particular church body or person, but invite all who love the Gospel of Jesus Christ to engage in this debate. We do so in the spirit of the great Reformer, Martin Luther, as we implore the mercies of God upon His Church, for the sake of Jesus Christ, the Lord of the Church and Bishop of our souls.


1. When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said “Repent,” He willed that the whole life of believers should be one of repentance.

2. To “repent” means to be contrite for one’s sins and to trust Jesus Christ and solely in His completed work for one’s forgiveness, life, and salvation.

3. Those who describe the Christian life as purpose-driven deny true repentance, confuse the Law and the Gospel, and obscure the merits of Christ.

4. Impious and wicked are the methods of those who substitute self-help and pop-psychology for the Gospel in the name of relevance.

5. This impious disregard for the Gospel wickedly transforms sacred Scripture into a guidebook for living, a pharisaic sourcebook of principles, and sows tares among the wheat.

6. Relevance, self-help and pop-psychology have no power to work true contrition over sins and faith in Jesus Christ.

7. Like clouds without rain, purpose-driven preachers withhold the proclamation of the forgiveness of sins won by Christ on the cross and enslave men’s consciences to the law which they cleverly disguise as so-called 'Biblical Principles'.

8. By teaching tips for attaining perfect health, debt-free wealth, and better sex in marriage, the purveyors of relevance undermine true fear, love and trust in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

9. They are enemies of Christ, who distort the Word of God by tearing verses from their original context in order to use them as proof texts for their self-help, pop-psychology agendas.

10. Injury is done the Word of God when it is used as a source book for practical, relevant “life applications.”

11. In the name of relevance, our Lord Jesus Christ is reduced to a life-coach whose “gospel” assists and motivates people to achieve the objectives of their self-centered delusions of grandeur.

12. Apart from the Holy Spirit, the seeker cannot understand the things of God for these are “spiritually discerned” (1 Cor 2:14).

13. The natural man does not naturally seek the Gospel. “I was found by those who did not seek me; I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me” (Is. 65:1)

14. The true Seeker of men’s souls is our Lord Jesus Christ who came to seek and to save the lost by His death on the cross (Luke 19:10).

15. The truly “seeker-sensitive” church proclaims God’s wrath against our sin and His mercy for Jesus’ sake.

16. The preaching of Christ crucified is a stumbling block to purpose-driven pragmatists and foolishness to church growth consultants.

17. The true gold of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God.

18. But this treasure is a stench in the nostrils of fallen and sinful men because it exposes man’s complete lack of ability to save himself by his own religious efforts.

19. On the other hand, the fool’s gold of self-help is preferred by sinful men, for it creates the illusion of moral progress and a life that is pleasing to God apart from repentance.

20. The gold of the Gospel is the net by which Christ would make us fishers of men.

21. The fool’s gold of self-help is a snare by which purpose-driven purveyors of relevance attempt to capture the riches and approval of men.

22. The church is holy sheep who hear the voice of their Shepherd.

23. How can sheep hear the voice of their Shepherd when false shepherds preach self-help and pop-psychology?

24. Purveyors of purpose-driven relevance are not shepherds of men’s souls but wolves in sheep’s clothing.

25. Purveyors of relevance claim that self-help, life-applications and biblical principles are the means to reach the unchurched because they meet people’s felt needs.

26. Yet a person’s greatest need is one he does not by nature feel, namely the need for the righteousness that comes from God through faith in Jesus Christ.

27. The true means by which fallen sinners are reached is the preaching of Christ and His sacraments. (Romans 10:17)

28. The true need that mankind is seeking but does not know is justification by grace through faith for Christ’s sake.

29. Since justification is through faith and not through works, natural man neither seeks it nor desires it.

30. Therefore, the teaching of justification by grace through faith is neither seeker-sensitive nor relevant to a world that naturally seeks self-justification.

31. To be in the church is to be union with Christ through faith.

32. Regardless of the number of people in attendance, the church does not grow unless men are granted repentance and faith by God through the action of His Word.

33. Scripture clearly teaches that the means by which God grants faith are the the hearing of the Word of Christ (the Gospel) and the water of Holy Baptism.

34.Therefore, even if a congregation, through their own marketing methods and business prowess were able to draw 100,000 people every Sunday, if the Gospel is not heard and the sacraments are not administered according to the Gospel there is no church and the true Church of Jesus Christ has not grown by a single soul.

35. If numerical growth is a measure of God’s approval, then we must conclude that God approves of Islam and the Mormons.

36. If financial success is a measure of God’s approval, then we must conclude that God approves of pornography and gambling.

37. Cancer and crabgrass both grow rapidly, as does the church that obscures the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

38. The purveying of purpose-driven relevance is the theology of glory; the preaching of Christ crucified for sinners is the theology of the cross.

39. The theologian of glory says that the kingdom of God is visible now in buildings, people, and dollars; the theologian of the cross says that the kingdom of God is an article of faith.

40. The theologian of glory asks “How much?” and “How many?”; the theologian of the cross preaches Christ regardless of how much or how many.

41. The theologian of glory prepares people to receive health, wealth, and happiness; the theologian of the cross prepares people to suffer and die in faith.

42. The theologian of glory preaches that God wants to grant you favors; the theologian of the cross preaches the favor of God for the sake of Christ crucified.

43. The theologian of glory proclaims 40 days of purpose; the theologian of the cross preaches daily dying and rising in Jesus.

44. God established the Church to be a “mouth house” of forgiveness not a madhouse of activity.

45. Christ wills that His voice be heard in His Church and not the voice of man when He says, “He who hears you, hears me.” (Luke 10:16)

46. Purveyors of purpose-driven relevance obscure the voice of Christ and so draw the sheep away from the Good Shepherd.

47. Christ saves from sin and death not through the motivation of the sinner to do good, but through baptismal death and resurrection.

48. The mission of the church is not to transform the world but to disciple the nations by baptizing and teaching (Matt 28:19-20).

49. Anyone who preaches a vision and demands allegiance to it sets up a new papacy among the churches.

50. A synod or church body is a human institution that exists by the will and consent of its member congregations and pastors.

51. A synod or church body is not merely an affiliation of churches that agree on a common purpose.

52. A synod or church body is not the Church, properly speaking, but a fellowship of churches sharing a common confession of faith and practice.

53. Synods are not of the church’s essence (esse) but for her well being (bene esse).

54. Synodical leaders are not lords over the churches, but servants of the churches and stewards of their common possessions.

55. Synodical leaders are not called to promulgate visions but to execute the collective will of the synod’s churches.

56. The old papacy arrogated the Church’s treasury of merits; the new papacy arrogates the Church’s treasury.

57. The old papacy said, “As the coin in the coffer clings, so the soul from purgatory springs.”

58. The new papacy says, “As the coin in the church coffer clings, so another program out of debt springs.”

59. The old papacy counted plenary indulgences; the new papacy counts money and people.

60. The old papacy suppressed the Gospel through canon law; the new papacy suppresses the Gospel through constitutions and by-laws.

61. The old papacy was a friend of Caesar; the new papacy is a friend of Mammon.

62. The old papacy bound a man’s conscience for the sake his wallet; the new papacy binds a man’s wallet for the sake of his conscience.

63. The old papacy promulgated infallible dogma; the new papacy promulgates undebatable visions.

64. The old papacy claims to sit on the seat of Peter; the new papacy claims to sit on the mandate of the majority.

65. The old papacy reserved the right to judge doctrine and practice; the new papacy judges doctrine and practice by commissions and committees.

66. The old papacy issued “bulls;” the new papacy issues task force reports.

67. The old papacy had a college of cardinals; the new papacy has high-priced consultants.

68. Just as popes and councils have erred in the past, so synodical leaders and synodical conventions err in the present.

69. A synod that is concerned for the true unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace does not excuse unionism and syncretism.

70. Unity in doctrine and practice means discernible interchangeability in teaching, preaching, and practice.

71. Unity in doctrine and practice does not consist in signing confessional statements, but in word and deed.

72. Worship is doctrine put into practice.

73. As one worships, so one believes.

74. As one believes, so one worships.

75. Christian worship consists in God’s service to us through His giving and our receiving in faith the gifts of Christ’s Word, Body, and Blood, and our service to God by our prayer, praise, and thanksgiving.

76. Worship that is focused principles for Christian living obscures the Gospel of Jesus Christ and His gifts and is detrimental to faith and salvation.

77. While Christian liberty allows that worship forms need not be altogether the same in every time and place, unity in faith and practice requires that worship forms must not be altogether different in every time and place.

78. Worship forms serve as identifying banners in the confessional field of battle.

79. Peculiar and novel worship forms obscure the unity of the churches and extol the creativity of the worship leaders.

80. In matters neither commanded nor forbidden in the Word of God (adiaphora), the churches of God are free to change ceremonies according to circumstances, as may be most beneficial and edifying to the churches of God. (Epitome, Art X.4)

81. Such changes must avoid all frivolity and offenses, particularly with regard to those who are weak in faith (Epitome, Art X.5).

82. Where the Gospel is at stake, concessions in ceremony must not be made so as to suggest unity with those who deny the Gospel (Epitome, Art X.6)

83. Therefore, it is contrary to the doctrine of adiaphora to hide the substance of Lutheran doctrine behind a non-Lutheran style of worship.

84. To create and sustain saving faith, God established the office of the holy ministry in the church to preach the Gospel and administer the sacraments according to our Lord’s institution.

85. No one may publicly preach, teach, or administer the sacraments in the churches without his being called and ordained.

86. Those who introduce novelties into the church are the true agents of division.

87. The ordination of women is a novelty that has caused great division in the church.

88. The introduction of worship forms not held in common by the churches is a cause of division and a stumbling block.

89. The church belongs to no man but to Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God, and Lord of the church.

90. Woe to the false prophets who cry, “Unity, unity” when there is no unity.

91. Again, woe to those who say, “Peace, peace,” when there is no peace.

92. Again, woe to those who say, “Gospel, gospel,” when there is no Gospel.

93. Blessed are those who say, “Cross, cross,” when there is no cross.

94. Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through all suffering, death, and hell;

95. And thus be confident of entering into heaven through many trials and tribulations, rather than through the assurance of outward peace, unity, and happiness.

David's Strand of Pearls

Radio15flash_5

Here are some pearls of wisdom David Strand cast yesterday as reported in today's St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

*David Strand, the executive director of the church's communications board, said the cancellation was based on economics, not politics.

The "economics" are obviously guided by the $2.1 million the LCMS shelled out to consultants in 2007.

*He said KFUO-AM (the church also runs KFUO-FM, a classical music station) has lost $3.5 million since 2001, including more than $600,000 last year.

This is not to mention questionable cross-charges, exorbitant administrative costs, excessive fund raising charges, and the fact that KFUO-FM with its 18 employees and $1.07 million salary load is supposed to help fund KFUO-AM which is considered a "mission and ministry" of the LCMS.

It's interesting to note that KFUO-AM began losing money the same year Pres. Kieschnick took office.

*"We have tried every cost-cutting measure we can think of for a long time," Strand said. "And we've tried every fundraising measure we can think of. ... 'Issues' was the largest and most obvious cut at our disposal."

 Every cost-cutting measure?  Issues, Etc. was the only fat in KFUO's $3.7 million budget?

Every
fundraising measure?  Like skimming 40% of the money raised and canceling the show in the middle of its fundraising drive?

Why didn't Mr. Strand fire the station management that received a no confidence vote from the BCS?

*Strand would not say whether the church was considering a sale of its stations.

Any bets on when KFUO goes up on the auction block to pay the LCMS credit card?

*He pointed out that the 7,000 signatures make up one-third of 1 percent of the church body.

Not to mention 1,650 listeners in the St. Louis area and 64 people who listen to live stream on the internet.

It's nice to know what your opinion is worth at the Purple Palace.  Numbers.  Let's see, if 7,000 is one-third of 1% (neglecting the fact that several signatures are from folks outside the LCMS), that means we are 2.1 million and shrinking under the leadership of the Kieschnick administration.


*In the vacated time slot, the church has launched a new program called "The Afternoon Show," with topics Strand said should have a broader appeal.

Mr. Strand would be referring to this:

April 14, 2008

Why?

You can read the early reports on today's protest at the International Center here and here.

Demonstration_3

KFUO Sharathon Week

05_shar_logoIn three days, KFUO will hold its annual on-air fundraiser called “Sharathon 2008.”

Since the removal of Issues, Etc. from the air on March 18, we have learned some sad facts regarding how business was being done at KFUO.

Here are six questions to consider before this year’s Sharathon:

1. Why does KFUO earn an ”F” grade for financial transparency with Ministry Watch, an organization that rates the 400 largest church ministries in the United States? Would you give to any other Christian media ministry that earned an “F”?

2. Why were significant KFUO-FM costs shifted to KFUO-AM as late as 2007?

3. Can you be sure that a check made out to “KFUO” will go to KFUO-AM and not to KFUO-FM?

4. Why does it cost the LCMS Foundation 38.4 cents to raise a dollar for KFUO? Why did the LCMS Foundation charge KFUO $361,604 to raise $941,739 in 2007?

5. Why does the Program/Development Director for KFUO-FM serve on the board of directors for, and raise money for a group that supports embryonic stem cell research?

6. If KFUO management disagreed with the cancellation of Issues, Etc., why haven’t they publicly stated this disagreement?

It's time for the LCMS and for KFUO to "share" the answers to these questions.

On April 17, 18 and 19 we would like to encourage you to call (800)730-2727 and ask them to share the answers to these questions with you.

April 13, 2008

Why Save the LCMS?

We believe that the LCMS is worth saving as a church body.  We believe that the LCMS has been hijacked by a foreign theology that has taken over the synod much the way a virus takes over the body by invading the body’s cells.  We believe that it is worth the effort to rescue the LCMS from its Babylonian captivity to an aggressive form of bureaucracy that is hell-bent on transforming Christ's Church into a seeker-sensitive, emergent “church” under the pretense of making it more competitive in the American religious marketplace.

Why go through the trouble of saving the LCMS?  Why not simply depart in peace, as some are suggesting?  We cite four reasons:

1.  The Gospel of Jesus Christ is at stake.  Where the Gospel is at stake, the souls of men and women for whom Christ died are at stake, as is the article upon which the Church stands or falls.  This is really the second round of a war that began in the 1970’s.  Then, the formal principle of our theology was at stake - the Holy Scriptures.  Today, the material principle of our theology is at stake - the message of justification by faith alone through grace alone for Christ’s sake alone.  This conflict is really nothing more than a continuation of unresolved conflicts of the “Seminex” era. 

2.  The institutional structure of the synod is useful.  We have two fine seminaries, a network of universities, an historical institute, a radio station, a publishing house, and a system of districts and circuits that could, if run properly, serve our congregations and the spread of confessional orthodoxy throughout the world.  To abandon this structure would mean to start everything over from scratch, something that is certainly possible but not practical.  To walk out would be to relinquish ownership of the synodical machinery into the hands of those who clearly have little use for it.

3.  The LCMS name continues to be recognized in the world as a leader of confessional Lutheranism.  Thanks to our mission and human care work, confessional Lutherans worldwide look to the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod for theological leadership.  In spite of efforts to change our name, we enjoy a high degree of name recognition among Lutherans in Africa, the Pacific Rim, eastern Europe, Russia, Siberia, the free Lutheran churches of Europe, and our persecuted brothers in the Scandinavian free churches.  It would be a shame to abandon the LCMS name to those who do not wish to fly the banner of confessional orthodoxy.

4.  The LCMS is neither our grandfather’s church nor is it our church.  The LCMS is a fellowship of churches who have been called by Jesus Christ, the Lord of the Church, to stand firm in the one true faith.  It is the church body who gave us CFW Walther, Franz Pieper, Walter A. Maier, Oswald Hoffmann, A.C. Piepkorn, Kurt Marquart, Norman Nagel, and so many others who contended for the faith.  Our fathers and grandfathers are being dishonored in word and deed, and by extension, so is our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Therefore, we are called to rise and speak in the present moment.  We owe it to our fathers in the faith to contend for what they taught us and not let our Reformation heritage be adulterated by false prophets and misleading methodologies

We believe there is a faithful remnant in the LCMS that holds fast to our tradition of hymnal-based liturgical worship and biblical-confessional theology, that grieves over the disunity caused by those who would effect change and introduce novelties into our churches, that is resolved to resist the intrusion of false theology and misleading methodology into our fellowship of churches.  We stand together with them to inform and inspire.

For these reasons, we choose to stay and mount a vigorous resistance so that the glorious light of the Gospel of Jesus Christ may once again shine forth clearly from congregations gathered under the banner of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod.

Oh, therefore, let us never listen to those who praise and extol the conflict of the Reformation for the pure Gospel but want to know nothing of a similar conflict in our days. God's command: "Contend for the faith!" applies to all times, also to ours. Let also our hearts be kindled by the fiery zeal with which Luther and his faithful helpers fought. Let us not like a coward surrender without a fight what they in hot conflict and with word, writing, blood, and tears gained by conflict, but faithfully preserve it and courageously defend it against all assaults until death. Let us consider no truth revealed for salvation as insignificant and agree to its falsification; for here applies: "A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump." Nor let us be concerned that for the sake of our conflict our names are rejected as malicious people. Even Luther and his helpers once had to experience this, and today millions bless them after they are long since at rest in their graves. If today we show that we are not the degenerated but the true children of the Reformation, some day when we also lie dust to dust, our children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren will bless us.  (CFW Walther, Sermon for Reformation, 1876)

April 12, 2008

St. Louis - We Have a Problem!

Pres. Kieschnick claims in his rebuttal letter to the WSJ that we are a united synod, but the report of his Blue Ribbon Task Force for Funding the Mission (2006) disagrees.  One of the Task Force’s assumptions is that our divisions are getting in the way of raising money:

The above words are a paraphrase of a famous quote from astronaut James Lovell on Apollo 13 when he simply radioed command central and said “Houston, we’ve got a problem here”. Over and over as our Task Force met we were confronted with a significant roadblock put up in front of every “Funding The Mission Model” we discussed. We were confronted with the division in our synod and the resultant mis-trust that seems to permeate and impact every level of funding decisions. Individuals, congregations and districts are making funding decisions partially depending upon “who is in control” at district and Synodical levels of authority. Our Task Force has a recommendation later in this report (Recommendation # 3) that may move us forward toward a more unified church body. And we have gone ahead with other recommendations understanding that the current state of division in our church is an “assumption” we will have to live with until it is dealt with. Our other recommendations can be carried out with the assumption that for now: “St. Louis, we have a problem”. And our prayer is: FROM SUCH DIVISION, GOOD LORD, DELIVER US.  (p. 7)

The proposed solution sounds even more ominous than the problem.  Borrowing a page from Pres. Bush’s Iraq war policy, the Task Force proposes the formation of a “coalition of the willing” and punishing the unwilling by withholding synodical services, though it is not clear what that would entail.

What we seek through the following recommendations is to gather together a “coalition of the willing” who are in agreement with the importance of “common good” activities as a way to fulfill the Great Commission by the most efficient stewardship of the resources the Lord has bestowed upon us. As for those who are UNWILLING, perhaps there should be consideration of limiting the benefits available to them if they voluntarily reject the “common good” principle that they agreed to when they joined the Synod in the first place.  (p. 8)

The Task Force recommends that the Board of Directors and the Council of District Presidents convene a summit meeting of “respected leaders” to draft a unanimous statement that harmonizes our divisions into a “symphony.”  Unanimity is presupposed; there is no place for a dissenting minority.

This Task Force believes the Council of Presidents and the Board of Directors are the elected “leaders” of the Synod that should be given the responsibility to initiate a specific plan to clarify for the sake of the whole church a strategy to restore harmony in our Synod. We encourage them to consider bringing together a representative group of respected leaders throughout this church for a summit. At the end of this summit these church leaders should author a unanimously adopted “symphony” that demonstrates how this great church body can provide a God-pleasing witness of our confession and practice.

Let them deal with current topics to define how narrow or wide is the road we “walk together” (SYNOD) must be when it comes to worship practice, the role of the laity, close communion, the role of women and our interaction with fellow Christians. But let the product of their coming together be to honor the Scriptures (including the Great Commission) and Confessions and dishonor the work of Satan that diverts us from the “way of the Lord”. (p.14)

Those who do not wish to "embrace the convention mandated mission of our church" are invited to leave the synod.  However, the previous paragraph deals with a unanimous statement of harmony by a summit of respected leaders.  Is this the same as the convention-mandate mission of our church?  The Task Force is ominously ambiguous:

The generation long divisions among us have frustrated us all. Allowing for proper dissent through by-law allowed procedures, we also recommend that those members of this Synod that cannot embrace the convention mandated mission of our church should feel free to leave this fellowship with truth-filled integrity and find another association with whom they can partner.  (p. 14)

Questions:

Was the cancellation of Issues, Etc. for financial reasons due in part to the fact that it was perceived as a “divisive” element, representing an "abrasive" form of “hyper-orthodoxy” unwilling to tolerate harmony with heterodoxy?

Are the terminations of Wilken and Schwarz a prelude of a greater purge to come?

This report is an important document and needs to be read carefully.  It provides deep insight into the mind of the current administration concerning any dissent or resistance to its plan.

The members of the Blue Ribbon Task Force that produced this report were:

David Buegler     Avon OH
William Diekelman     St. Louis MO
Gloria Edwards     Portola Valley CA
Kirk Farney     Hinsdale IL
Merle Freitag     St. Louis MO
Dwayne Jobst     Menomonee Falls WI
John Kieschnick     Houston TX
Keith Kohlmeier     Topeka KS
Tom Kuchta     St. Louis MO
Day May     Ft. Wayne IN
Carol Olson     Afton MN
Gary Thies     Mapleton IA
Ed Trapp     Dallas TX
Chad Woltemath     Ann Arbor MI
Mark Zehnder     Omaha NE

HT: http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=10295

April 11, 2008

7000!

The On-line Petition in support of Issues, Etc. has just reached 7000 signatures!  7000 signatures from all over the world on behalf of a show with only 1,650 local St. Louis area listeners to KFUO-AM and 64 people who listened to the live stream on the internet!

"Yet I will leave seven thousand in Israel, all the knees that have not bowed to Baal, and every mouth that has not kissed him.” (1Kings 19:18)

April 10, 2008

District Pastors' Conferences Speak Out

District pastoral conferences are speaking out officially on the cancellation of Issues, Etc.  The Southern Illinois District Pastoral Conference issued a resolution calling for the reinstatement of Wilken and Schwarz with a public apology.  The pastors of the South Wisconsin District unanimously passed a resolution instructing the Rev. John Wille, the SWD district president, to express their concerns directly to the Council of Presidents, the Board for Communications Services, the Board of Directors, and synodical president Gerald Kieschnick.*

Other appropriate actions for resolutions include the formation of an independent committee to investigate the events leading up to the decision to cancel  Issues, Etc. and a comprehensive, independent, external financial audit of the Synod and KFUO.

*Addendum*
4/10/08 - The South Dakota District Pastors' Conference has also passed a similar resolution.

HT:  Weedon’s Blog, Preachrblog

KFUO FM Program Director is an Embryonic Stem Cell Research Activist

ConnetJim Connett Program/Development Director for KFUO-FM is on the board of directors for a Hope Happens, a activist group that is pushing for Embryonic Stem Cell Research (aka destroying human embryos in order to harvest stem cells for research).

Connett's activism flies directly in the face of the LCMS's pro-life stand and in light of the fact that Todd Wilken and Issues Etc. had an amazing pro-life record this makes us believe that there is something terribly wrong at KFUO and in the Missiouri Synod.

HT: RAsburry's Res

April 09, 2008

Kieschnick vs. Hemingway - Who has 20/20 vision?

The print engagement between Pres. Gerald Kieschnick and Mollie “M.Z.” Hemingway over her article in the Wall Street Journal illustrates an important difference in perspective.  Setting aside the termination of Issues, Etc. for financial reasons, Pres. Kieschnick took issue with Ms. Hemingway's claim that the synod was deeply divided.

She wrote:

The program was in all likelihood a pawn in a larger battle for the soul of the Missouri Synod. The church is divided between, on the one hand, traditional Lutherans known for their emphasis on sacraments, liturgical worship and the church's historic confessions and, on the other, those who have embraced pop-culture Christianity and a market-driven approach to church growth. The divide is well known to all confessional Christian denominations struggling to retain their traditional identity.

He wrote:

In truth, last summer the LCMS had its most positive and unified convention in years. Our church remains faithful to the Scriptures and Lutheran Confessions, an integral part of our identity as a church body. As stated in a resolution adopted last summer by the national Synod convention: “From the founding of our Synod 160 years ago, we have been blessed by unity in our common confession and the articles of our shared faith, such as the Trinity, the person and work of Christ, original sin, baptismal regeneration, the real presence of Christ’s body and blood in the Sacrament, the inerrancy of Scripture and many others."

Ms. Hemingway is speaking of the fact that the churches and pastors that comprise the synod are divided and cites examples to this effect.  Pres. Kieschnick is speaking of the fact that the corporate synod (“our church”) is united in its goal and cites the 2007 synodical convention.  These are two radically different points of view.  Ms. Hemingway sees the synod as an collection of churches and pastors that is deeply divided along doctrinal and practical lines.  Pres. Kieschnick sees the synod as a unified corporate entity through the lens of a corporate“vision" statement.  For Ms. Hemingway, "synod" is churches; for Pres. Kieschnick, "synod" is church.

For the record, the 2007 synodical convention passed Res. 4-01A which directs the Council of Presidents and the Board of Directors to come up with a plan “to restore harmony to our Synod.”  This resolution passed by an overwhelming margin of 1014 to 169.  In other words, the synodical convention was unified in recognizing that our churches are in a state of discord and disunity. 

The same synodical convention reelected Pres. Kieschnick to a third term by a margin of 53%.

So who has 20/20 “vision” when it comes to the actual state of the synod?

April 07, 2008

LCMS World Relief Funds - Safe and Secure!?

Questions over the cancellation of Issues, Etc. for "business stewardship reasons" have opened a broader discussion over the stewardship of the Synod’s finances in general.  This has led to some speculation and concern regarding the use of LCMS World Relief-Human Care (WR-HC) money.  Save the LCMS! has obtained a WR-HC report which was part of the protocol for the February 2008 meeting of the LCMS Board of Directors.

Here is a Summary:

1.  LCMS World Relief-Human Care is currently holding $5 million in undesignated funds and $1.5 million in international disaster relief money for a total of $6,500,000.  These funds sit in the Synod's general fund and are being used by the Synod to cover operating expenses prior to their disbursement.

*Question* - How much of the Synod's $10 million line of credit from LCEF is being used to cover these funds?  Pres. Kieschnick also authorized an additional $5 million line of credit from LCEF to cover Fan into Flame costs.

2.  Though these relief funds accrue interest for the Synod, none of the interest income is shared with LCMS World Relief.  ($6.5 M at a modest 2% would earn $130,000 per year.)  Prior requests by WR-HC for a small share of interest funds were denied.

3.  LCMS WR-HC also pays the same* general and administrative costs and LCMS Foundation costs as all other entities of the Synod.

*We have learned that WR-HC is charged 12¢ per dollar raised by LCMS Foundation, not the 40¢ per dollar raised charged to Issues, Etc.

*We do not have the budget for WR-HC.  We do know that in 2007 KFUO was charged $306,850 in General & Administrative costs (9% of its total budget).

4.  LCMS WR-HC has never been denied a demand on its relief funds.  However Rev. Harrison suggests that LCMS World Relief-Human Care become a free standing entity out of his concern for the Synod’s heavy dependence on disaster dollars.

*Question* - To date, how much money has the Synod borrowed from LCEF to cover World Relief-Human Care funds?

5.  Pres. Kieschnick specifically ordered an audit of World Relief-Human Care covering the last four years.  Thankfully, everything was found to be in good order.

*Question*  Why was this special audit specifically ordered by Pres. Kieschnick?

There are even more Questions:

To date, how much has the Synod borrowed from LCEF?

To what extent is the Synod tying up and drawing money away from its own missions and ministries?

Is the cancellation of Issues, Etc. for "business stewardship reasons" the tip of a much bigger financial iceberg?

___________________________________________

Dear Members of the Board of Directors,

Grace and peace.

1. Despite this very challenging situation, still, LCMS WR-HC remains perhaps in the strongest and most viable financial position among entities within Synod Inc., enjoying some $5,000,000 in undesignated funds, and some $1,500,000 in international disaster funding. We fully realize this situation is temporary. 

2. The Board for Human Care requested of the previous sitting LCMS BOD that WR-HC receive some very modest reimbursement as interest on disaster and other funds held by Synod Inc. This request was denied. This of course, is not insignificant in that over the past several years there have been times when the Synod has held as much as $15,000,000 or more of LCMS WR designated funding (disaster/bequest/ designatedundesignated). Thus by using LCMS WR-HC designated funding for Synod operations (prior to their expenditure for designated purposes), the Synod continues to accrue millions of dollars of benefit. While it is perfectly legal for Synod Inc. to make use of these dollars until expended for the designated purpose (relief/disaster/development etc.), this long-standing practice of funding Synod operations with WR-HC designated funds remains problematic for us for several reasons: 

a. This practice is not generally pleasing to donors. 

b. This practice presents us (Matt Harrison and WR-HC Board and Staff) with a problem of conscience as a matter of integrity over against donors (a token benefit would have helped alleviate this problem). 

c. The practice is essentially a heavy burden on WR-HC programs, and her donors, and more importantly, upon the poor and needy assisted. In addition to paying the requisite general and administrative costs, Foundation costs etc, unlike most other entities given similar relief, development and disaster responsibilities, we pay an additional and expensive premium simply because we are highly trusted, and donors have so generously responded. That trust can evaporate. 

Unfortunately, we do not expect the practice of using WR-HC designated funding for Synod
operations to end. The practice is long standing. The Synod’s Board and the Treasurer of Synod face deep challenges and are operating in good faith and with the best of intentions in serving the broader Synod. We have never faced a situation where we have desired to release funds for a designated purpose and were unable to acquire the funds. That is to the deep credit and good management of the Synod’s Treasurer and his staff.

There is no question of good faith and good intentions. The Synod faces deeper financial struggles than ever before. But I wish to humbly bear witness and plead that somewhere in the mix of impending change (structural, constitutional, etc.), a solution to this problem may be found some way, some how, or at least considered.  Twenty years ago, the Seventh Day Adventists had the foresight to spin off their similar relief arm into a free standing entity (like CPH or LCEF), and that organization went from 20 million dollars in relief and development to 170 million dollars a year (Adventist Relief and Development Agency). If the Synod wanted to assist the poor and needy maximally, that is what she would do. I realize that is highly unlikely, particularly as the Synod has continued to experience financial decline and has come to depend heavily upon disaster dollars. 

3. We are thankful for the audit requested by the President, covering four years of disaster spending. We are delighted with the results which found nothing inappropriate. The audit did make numerous suggestions for strengthening our internal processes and procedures. We had expanded so rapidly in the nature of our response to disaster that it was impossible for policy to keep up with what we were facing and learning year by year (from 9/11 to Tsunami to Katrina). I am delighted to note that we have now responded accordingly with much strengthened policies and written procedures. And we have expanded these also into all areas of the operation.   

Much more could be said. I submit these thoughts with the best intentions, and humbly, for the sake of a clear conscience before God and neighbor. 

Matt Harrison
LCMS World Relief and Human Care